Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Sony |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-08-05 | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 483 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZ2 Compact is a bit better than OPPO Reno4 Pro, getting a general score of 79 against 72.1. Although it's the best cellphone in this comparison, the Xperia XZ2 Compact construction is notably older, a little bit heavier and thicker than OPPO Reno4 Pro. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Xperia XZ2 Compact has newer 8.0 Oreo version while OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10 version.
The Xperia XZ2 Compact has a bit more powerful CPU than OPPO Reno4 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Xperia XZ2 Compact features a little sharper display than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has much more opaque screen, a way smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 2160px resolution, it also counts with a quite better screen pixels density.
Xperia XZ2 Compact features more memory capacity to install games and applications than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 400 GB. OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 2870mAh.
OPPO Reno4 Pro shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also counts with a camera with a much better resolution, a bigger aperture for better photos and videos in low-light situations and a bigger camera sensor capturing better quality pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.