Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Sony |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-05 | 2017-04-05 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZs is just a bit better than OPPO Reno4 Pro, getting a 77.2 score against 72.1. Xperia XZs's construction weights the same than OPPO Reno4 Pro, but it is a bit thicker. The OPPO Reno4 Pro has a better display than Sony Xperia XZs, because although it has a bit lower pixels number per inch of screen, it also counts with a bigger screen and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
OPPO Reno4 Pro has a better storage capacity for apps and games than Sony Xperia XZs, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal storage. The OPPO Reno4 Pro features a little bit better processing power than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores (and also faster).
Xperia XZs has a better camera than OPPO Reno4 Pro, although it has a tinier back camera sensor which offers a lower image and video quality, a lot lower 19 megapixels resolution back-facing camera, a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light photography and video.
OPPO Reno4 Pro has a superior battery life than Xperia XZs, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2900mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.