Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 81.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-08-05 | 2019-04-15 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 616 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3070mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a global score of 81.4, which is better than OPPO Reno4 Pro's general score of 72.1. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a newer 9.0 Pie version and OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10. Although the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE is older than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, it's design is a little bit thinner and just a little lighter.
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE's processor is very similar to the CPU in OPPO Reno4 Pro, and although the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because although it has a little lower pixels density, it also counts with a much brighter screen, a little bigger display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has as much storage capacity for applications and games as OPPO Reno4 Pro, they have the same internal memory capacity. OPPO Reno4 Pro has better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3070mAh. The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a camera that is very similar to the OPPO Reno4 Pro one, and although the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for taking pictures and videos in poorly lited environments, they both have a 0.5 inches back-facing camera sensor, the same video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a same resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.