Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-05 | 2018-04-03 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a global score of 83.8, which is much better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro's 72.1 score. Even being the best we compare here, Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s's design is noticeably older, heavier and a bit thicker than OPPO Reno4 Pro. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a bit better performance than OPPO Reno4 Pro. Both of them have the same RAM memory amount and 8 cores.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a sharper display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a little bit larger display, a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a just a little better quantity of pixels in each inch of display. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a way bigger memory for apps and games than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
OPPO Reno4 Pro features better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. The OPPO Reno4 Pro features a better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a back camera with a lot better 48 megapixels resolution, a lot bigger sensor which gives a way higher image and video quality and a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light images and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.