Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-08-05 | 2016-11-01 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.15 x 3.04 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Black and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 516.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 8.69 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4070mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Note 2 is slightly better than OPPO Reno4 Pro, getting a score of 76 against 72.1. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Mi Note 2 has newer 6.0 Marshmallow version while OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10. The Xiaomi Mi Note 2 design has the same thickness than OPPO Reno4 Pro, but it's just a little bit heavier.
OPPO Reno4 Pro has a little faster processor than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has a greater number of cores and a higher amount of RAM memory. The OPPO Reno4 Pro has a better screen than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has a little bit greater pixels count per screen inch, a quite larger display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro takes way better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a larger camera aperture to take better photography and video in low-light situations, a lot more mega pixels camera and a way larger back camera sensor which provides a lot higher image and video quality.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 2's memory capacity to install games and applications is just as good as OPPO Reno4 Pro's one, both have the same internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Mi Note 2 has just a little bit longer battery performance than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has a 2 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.