Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-05 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has an overall score of 87.9, which is way better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro's global score of 72.1. Both phones in this review include the same Android 10 OS, so you shouldn't see any differences in that aspect. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is a thicker and extremely heavier device than the OPPO Reno4 Pro.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a bit faster processing unit than OPPO Reno4 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. OPPO Reno4 Pro has a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also counts with a just a little greater pixel count per inch in the display and a brighter display.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro and OPPO Reno4 Pro have quite similar memory capacity for games and applications, both have exactly the same internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a superior camera than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a much better video resolution, a camera in the back with a much better 64 mega-pixels resolution and a larger sensor shooting better quality photographs.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has greater battery life than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.