Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-05 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has an overall score of 81.1, which is much better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro's general score of 72.1. Even being the best device in this review, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is an extremely heavier and thicker device than the OPPO Reno4 Pro. These phones use the same Android 10 operating system, so you shouldn't perceive any difference in that aspect.
OPPO Reno4 Pro has a better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of display. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's processing unit is very similar to the OPPO Reno4 Pro one, and although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a slightly better camera than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for taking photographs in low-light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing higher quality pictures and videos and a back facing camera with way more MP.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has longer battery lifetime than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has a 26 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.