Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.29 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Astral Blue and Starry Black | Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A77 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.54 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4350mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone X has a general score of 88.1, which is much better than the OPPO Reno5 Pro's 71.9 overall score. The iPhone X body has the same thickness than the OPPO Reno5 Pro, but it's a little bit heavier. OPPO Reno5 Pro features a bit more vivid display than iPhone X, because although it has a just a bit lower screen pixels density and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a much brighter display and a little larger display.
The iPhone X features a much better storage capacity to store more apps and games than OPPO Reno5 Pro, because it has more internal memory capacity. The iPhone X counts with a bit better performance than OPPO Reno5 Pro, because although it has an inferior number of cores and 5 GB less RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
The OPPO Reno5 Pro counts with a better camera than iPhone X, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition, the OPPO Reno5 Pro also counts with a lot higher resolution camera in the back and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light captures and video.
The OPPO Reno5 Pro features a much longer battery lifetime than iPhone X, because it has a 4350mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.