Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.29 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Astral Blue and Starry Black | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A77 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4350mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is much better than OPPO Reno5 Pro, having a score of 80 against 71.9. The Google Pixel 3 is a incredibly older and a bit thicker device than the OPPO Reno5 Pro, but Google was able to make it lighter anyway. OPPO Reno5 Pro features a little better performance than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Reno5 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM.
The OPPO Reno5 Pro counts with a bit better screen than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a just a little inferior pixel number per inch in the display, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a larger screen. The OPPO Reno5 Pro captures better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the OPPO Reno5 Pro also has a bigger camera aperture to capture better images and video in low light situations and a much better resolution back camera.
The OPPO Reno5 Pro has a very superior memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity. OPPO Reno5 Pro has a much better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 49 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.