Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | HTC |
| Android 11 | Android 5.0 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.29 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Astral Blue and Starry Black | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 405 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A77 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| ARM Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4350mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.24 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The HTC One M9 has an overall score of 77.7, which is slightly better than OPPO Reno5 Pro's 71.9 overall score. Even though the HTC One M9 is noticeably older and thicker than OPPO Reno5 Pro, it's construction is still a little bit lighter. Both phones in this review work with Android operating system, but the HTC One M9 has an older 5.0 version and OPPO Reno5 Pro has Android 11 version.
The HTC One M9 features just a bit better looking screen than OPPO Reno5 Pro, because although it has a bit lower 1920 x 1080px resolution and a way smaller display, it also counts with a bit greater pixels density. The OPPO Reno5 Pro counts with a lot bigger memory to install applications and games than HTC One M9, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The HTC One M9 has a bit faster processor than OPPO Reno5 Pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have 8 cpu cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with an additional GPU and a 64 bits processor. OPPO Reno5 Pro features a much longer battery life than HTC One M9, because it has 4350mAh of battery capacity.
OPPO Reno5 Pro has a superior camera than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the OPPO Reno5 Pro also has a camera with lot more mega pixels and a lot bigger aperture to take better low light captures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.