Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | HTC |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.29 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Astral Blue and Starry Black | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 405 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A77 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.54 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4350mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
HTC U Ultra is just a bit better than the OPPO Reno5 Pro, with a global score of 77 against 71.9. Even though the HTC U Ultra is older and a little bit thicker than the OPPO Reno5 Pro, it's design is still a little bit lighter. The OPPO Reno5 Pro has a bit sharper display than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a just a bit worse screen density and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen.
The OPPO Reno5 Pro has a little better processing power than HTC U Ultra, because it has more CPU cores and a larger amount of RAM memory. The HTC U Ultra has much more storage capacity to install applications and games than OPPO Reno5 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The OPPO Reno5 Pro features a very superior battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4350mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. OPPO Reno5 Pro takes better videos and photos than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rate, the OPPO Reno5 Pro also has a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels and a bigger aperture to capture better low light images and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.