Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | HTC |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.29 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Astral Blue and Starry Black | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 405 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A77 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4350mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
HTC U11 has an overall score of 77.6, which is slightly better than OPPO Reno5 Pro's general score of 71.9. Even though HTC U11 is incredibly older and just a little bit thicker than the OPPO Reno5 Pro, it's design is still just a little lighter. OPPO Reno5 Pro features a little faster processing unit than HTC U11, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Reno5 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
OPPO Reno5 Pro counts with a bit better looking screen than HTC U11, because although it has a little worse 1080 x 2400px resolution and a just a bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bigger screen. The OPPO Reno5 Pro shoots much clearer photographs and videos than HTC U11, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same video resolution and a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the OPPO Reno5 Pro also has a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
The OPPO Reno5 Pro has a slightly better memory capacity to install games and applications than HTC U11, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The OPPO Reno5 Pro counts with a much longer battery performance than HTC U11, because it has 4350mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.