Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-01-22 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.29 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Astral Blue and Starry Black | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A77 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4350mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ is better than OPPO Reno5 Pro, with a overall score of 82.5 against 71.9. The LG V30S ThinQ design is just a bit thinner and just a little lighter than the OPPO Reno5 Pro, even though it was released many years before. These phones have Android operating system, but the LG V30S ThinQ has 8.0 Oreo version while OPPO Reno5 Pro has Android 11.
OPPO Reno5 Pro has just a little better performance than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno5 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. OPPO Reno5 Pro features a little more vivid display than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a much lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit worse pixels quantity in each display inch, it also counts with a little bit larger screen.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than OPPO Reno5 Pro, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the LG V30S ThinQ also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. OPPO Reno5 Pro has improved battery performance than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 4350mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
The OPPO Reno5 Pro shoots better videos and photos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for taking photos or video in low light environments, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video quality, the OPPO Reno5 Pro also counts with a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.