Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.29 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Astral Blue and Starry Black | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A77 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4350mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is better than OPPO Reno5 Pro, having a score of 81.3 against 71.9. The LG V35 ThinQ body is a little lighter and just a little thinner than the OPPO Reno5 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released 3 years before. OPPO Reno5 Pro has just a bit better looking display than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a lot worse 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit lower display pixel density, it also counts with a quite bigger screen.
LG V35 ThinQ has a little bit better processing power than OPPO Reno5 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. OPPO Reno5 Pro takes much clearer photographs and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the OPPO Reno5 Pro also counts with a much more megapixels camera in the back.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with much more memory to install applications and games than OPPO Reno5 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. OPPO Reno5 Pro counts with better battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 4350mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.