Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.29 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Astral Blue and Starry Black | Blue and Brown |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A77 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4350mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Vision has a global score of 80.7, which is much better than the OPPO Reno5 Pro's score of 71.9. Despite being the best in this review, the Motorola One Vision body is older, just a bit heavier and thicker than OPPO Reno5 Pro. OPPO Reno5 Pro has just a little better performance than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Reno5 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
OPPO Reno5 Pro counts with a little sharper display than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a just a bit lower pixels density and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a little bigger display. The Motorola One Vision takes a bit better photos and videos than OPPO Reno5 Pro, although it has a camera in the back with lot less megapixels resolution and a worse (4K) video definition, they both have the same diafragm aperture.
Motorola One Vision has a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Reno5 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Motorola One Vision also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 512 GB. OPPO Reno5 Pro counts with improved battery duration than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 24% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.