Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.29 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Astral Blue and Starry Black | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A77 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4350mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A31 is much better than OPPO Reno5 Pro, having a global score of 81.3 against 71.9. Both devices in this review work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy A31 has 10 version and OPPO Reno5 Pro has Android 11. Even though Galaxy A31 is better than OPPO Reno5 Pro, we must note that it is also older, just a bit heavier and somewhat thicker.
The OPPO Reno5 Pro has just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A31, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Reno5 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM. OPPO Reno5 Pro features a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A31, because although it has a little lower display density, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the OPPO Reno5 Pro also counts with a little larger display.
The OPPO Reno5 Pro has a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A31, because it has a way more mega pixels back camera, a larger diafragm aperture to take better photos and video in low light environments and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition. Galaxy A31 features a bigger storage capacity for apps and games than OPPO Reno5 Pro, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy A31 counts with just a little better battery duration than OPPO Reno5 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.