Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2021-02-25 |
| 6.29 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | -- |
| Astral Blue and Starry Black | Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ chipset | Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A77 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4350mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only is better than OPPO Reno5 Pro, having a score of 82 against 71.9. These devices have the same Android 11 OS. The Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only design is noticeably lighter but just a little bit thicker than OPPO Reno5 Pro, and they were only released 1 months apart. OPPO Reno5 Pro has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has a little lower display pixel density, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400px resolution, the OPPO Reno5 Pro also counts with a quite bigger display and more screen brightness.
OPPO Reno5 Pro counts with just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Reno5 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM. The Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than OPPO Reno5 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy A32 LTE Only has just a little better battery duration than OPPO Reno5 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4350mAh. The OPPO Reno5 Pro features just a bit better camera than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, and although they both have a same resolution back facing camera, the OPPO Reno5 Pro also has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light images and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.