Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.29 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Astral Blue and Starry Black | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A77 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4350mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A35 5G is better than the OPPO Reno5 Pro, with a 79.4 score against 71.9. Galaxy A35 5G's body is newer than OPPO Reno5 Pro's, although it is just a little bit thicker and heavier. Both phones in this comparison review have Android operating system, but Galaxy A35 5G has a newer 14 version and OPPO Reno5 Pro has Android 11 version, so it counts with some extra features.
OPPO Reno5 Pro has a lot better performance than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Reno5 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM. The OPPO Reno5 Pro counts with a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater number of pixels in each display inch, a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and way more brightness.
The Galaxy A35 5G and OPPO Reno5 Pro have incredibly similar memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, both have the same 128 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G's camera is just as good as the camera in OPPO Reno5 Pro, although the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a camera with much less mega-pixels and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for capturing images in low light environments.
The Galaxy A35 5G counts with a little longer battery performance than OPPO Reno5 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4350mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.