Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-01-22 | 2019-04-10 |
| 6.29 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 4.94 ounces |
| Astral Blue and Starry Black | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 437 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ chipset | Exynos 7904 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A77 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.54 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4350mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A40 is better than OPPO Reno5 Pro, getting a 79.6 score against 71.9. The Galaxy A40 design is lighter than the OPPO Reno5 Pro, although it's just a little bit thicker and was released just a bit over a year before. Both phones in this comparison review come with the same Android 11 OS. The OPPO Reno5 Pro counts with a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A40, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno5 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
OPPO Reno5 Pro features a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A40, because although it has a just a little lower display density, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit bigger display. OPPO Reno5 Pro counts with a way better camera than Galaxy A40, and although they both have the same aperture, the OPPO Reno5 Pro also has a way higher resolution camera and a way higher (4K) video definition.
Samsung Galaxy A40 counts with a bigger storage to install games and applications than OPPO Reno5 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The OPPO Reno5 Pro counts with a much better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A40, because it has a 4350mAh battery capacity against 3100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.