Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.29 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Astral Blue and Starry Black | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A77 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4350mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is better than the OPPO Reno5 Pro, getting an 83.8 score against 71.9. Galaxy A50 is a a bit lighter phone than OPPO Reno5 Pro, but both of them have the same thickness. The OPPO Reno5 Pro features a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno5 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
OPPO Reno5 Pro counts with a much better screen than Galaxy A50, because it has a quite larger screen, a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen. The OPPO Reno5 Pro shoots better photos and videos than Galaxy A50, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the OPPO Reno5 Pro also has a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition and a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Reno5 Pro, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB. The OPPO Reno5 Pro counts with a bit better battery life than Galaxy A50, because it has a 4350mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.