Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.29 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Astral Blue and Starry Black | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A77 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4350mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 has a score of 85.5, which is better than the OPPO Reno5 Pro's overall score of 71.9. The Galaxy A51 is an older and a little bit thicker cellphone than OPPO Reno5 Pro, but Samsung was able to build it a bit lighter anyway. Both phones we compare here include the same Android 11 OS (Operating System).
The OPPO Reno5 Pro has a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Reno5 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM memory. OPPO Reno5 Pro features a more vivid screen than Galaxy A51. Both have the same quantity of pixels per inch of screen, exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a display with the same size.
Galaxy A51 has a bit better camera than OPPO Reno5 Pro, although it has a worse video quality, a smaller camera aperture and a back-facing camera with a much lower resolution. Galaxy A51 has a much better memory capacity to install applications and games than OPPO Reno5 Pro, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A51 also has an external memory slot that admits up to 512 GB.
OPPO Reno5 Pro counts with a bit superior battery duration than Galaxy A51, because it has 4350mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.