Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.29 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Astral Blue and Starry Black | -- |
| -- | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A77 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4350mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 is a lot better than the OPPO Reno5 Pro, with a 90.7 score against 71.9. Despite being the best we compare here, Galaxy A52 is an a little bit thicker and a little bit heavier cellphone than OPPO Reno5 Pro. OPPO Reno5 Pro features a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A52, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Reno5 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM.
OPPO Reno5 Pro features a more vivid screen than Galaxy A52. Both have the same pixel density, a display with the same size and the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution. Galaxy A52 shoots a bit better photos and videos than OPPO Reno5 Pro, although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for taking images or videos in low light environments, they both have a same resolution camera in the back, the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The Galaxy A52 features much more storage for apps and games than OPPO Reno5 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A52 also has a SD card slot that holds up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A52 features just a little better battery duration than OPPO Reno5 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.