Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.29 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Astral Blue and Starry Black | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A77 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4350mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a global score of 91.3, which is way better than OPPO Reno5 Pro's global score of 71.9. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has the newer 12 version while OPPO Reno5 Pro has Android 11, providing the user some extra features and some performance improvements. Although it's the best device in this comparison review, Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is an a little thicker and just a bit heavier device than the OPPO Reno5 Pro.
The OPPO Reno5 Pro has a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno5 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory. OPPO Reno5 Pro has a much better looking display than Galaxy A52 5G. Both of them have a display of the same size, an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a higher count of pixels per inch in the display.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a very superior memory to install games and applications than OPPO Reno5 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a little better battery performance than OPPO Reno5 Pro, because it has a 3 percent larger battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G captures slightly better photographs and videos than OPPO Reno5 Pro, although it has a tinier camera aperture, they both have the same video frame rates, the same video quality and the same resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.