Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.29 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Astral Blue and Starry Black | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A77 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4350mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52s is way better than OPPO Reno5 Pro, getting a 91.1 score against 71.9. Despite being the best in this comparison review, Samsung Galaxy A52s's body is a little thicker and a little bit heavier than OPPO Reno5 Pro. Both phones in this review have the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't see any difference in that aspect.
OPPO Reno5 Pro has a brighter screen than Galaxy A52s. Both have the same pixel density, a screen of the same size and exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution. Samsung Galaxy A52s features a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than OPPO Reno5 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
OPPO Reno5 Pro has a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A52s, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Reno5 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A52s shoots a little bit better photos and videos than OPPO Reno5 Pro, although it has a tinier camera aperture, they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the same video frame rate and a back facing camera with a 64 mega pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s features just a bit longer battery performance than OPPO Reno5 Pro, because it has a 3% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.