Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-01-22 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.29 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Astral Blue and Starry Black | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A77 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4350mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A70 has a score of 76.9, which is slightly better than OPPO Reno5 Pro's global score of 71.9. The Galaxy A70 construction is older, a little bit thicker and just a bit heavier than OPPO Reno5 Pro. Both phones we are comparing work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A70 has 10 version and OPPO Reno5 Pro has Android 11.
The OPPO Reno5 Pro has a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno5 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM. The OPPO Reno5 Pro has a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the OPPO Reno5 Pro also counts with a quite greater number of pixels per inch of screen.
The OPPO Reno5 Pro features a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy A70. Both have the same camera aperture, the same video definition and the same video frame rates. Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a much better memory to install games and applications than OPPO Reno5 Pro, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a bit longer battery life than OPPO Reno5 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4350mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.