Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.29 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Astral Blue and Starry Black | Prism bricks black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A77 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4350mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW is much better than OPPO Reno5 Pro, with a overall score of 92.9 against 71.9. Despite being the best device in this review, Galaxy A71 5G UW is an a little bit thicker and just a bit heavier device than the OPPO Reno5 Pro. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Galaxy A71 5G UW has the older 10 version while OPPO Reno5 Pro has Android 11.
The OPPO Reno5 Pro has a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the OPPO Reno5 Pro also counts with a little higher display pixels density. The OPPO Reno5 Pro features a bit faster processor than Galaxy A71 5G UW. Both have 8 CPU cores and a 8 GB RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features much more storage capacity for applications and games than OPPO Reno5 Pro, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy A71 5G UW has just a little better battery duration than OPPO Reno5 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4350mAh.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW shoots just a bit better videos and photos than OPPO Reno5 Pro, although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for capturing photographs and/or video in poorly lited environments, they both have the same video frame rates, a 64 mega-pixels back camera and the same 3840x2160 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.