Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.29 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Astral Blue and Starry Black | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A77 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4350mAh Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A9 (2018) is much better than OPPO Reno5 Pro, with an 85.2 score against 71.9. Despite being the best we are comparing, the Galaxy A9 (2018) construction is notably older, just a bit heavier and just a little thicker than OPPO Reno5 Pro. The OPPO Reno5 Pro features a better screen than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400, a quite larger screen and a just a little higher pixels amount in each inch of display.
OPPO Reno5 Pro counts with a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Reno5 Pro also has more RAM memory. Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a much greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than OPPO Reno5 Pro, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also has a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB.
OPPO Reno5 Pro shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the same video frame rates and a F1.7 aperture, the OPPO Reno5 Pro also has a way more mega-pixels back camera. The OPPO Reno5 Pro counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 4350mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.