Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-01-22 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.29 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Astral Blue and Starry Black | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A77 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4350mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold is much better than OPPO Reno5 Pro, having a 97.6 score against 71.9. Galaxy Fold is an older and incredibly heavier device than the OPPO Reno5 Pro, but Samsung managed to make it just a little bit thinner anyway. Both devices in this review come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Fold has the newer 9.0 Pie version while OPPO Reno5 Pro has Android 11, so it counts with some extra features and optimized performance.
Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a bit better processor than OPPO Reno5 Pro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has more RAM memory. The OPPO Reno5 Pro has a more vivid screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher amount of pixels per inch in the screen.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a much greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than OPPO Reno5 Pro, because it has more internal storage capacity. The OPPO Reno5 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Fold both have similar batteries duration, although the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a 4380mAh battery size instead of 4350mAh.
OPPO Reno5 Pro captures much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has slower video frame rate and a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video definition, the OPPO Reno5 Pro also counts with a back camera with a way better 64 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.