Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.29 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Astral Blue and Starry Black | Black and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 405 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A77 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4350mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M51 is way better than OPPO Reno5 Pro, with an 87.7 score against 71.9. Although it's the best device we are comparing here, we must tell that it is also somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy M51 has 10 version and OPPO Reno5 Pro has Android 11.
The OPPO Reno5 Pro counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy M51, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Reno5 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. The OPPO Reno5 Pro has a better looking screen than Galaxy M51, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little more pixels per inch in the display.
Galaxy M51 counts with a bit better camera than OPPO Reno5 Pro, although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for capturing photos and/or video in poorly lited environments, they both have the same video definition, a 64 mega-pixels back-facing camera and the same 30 fps video frame rates.
Samsung Galaxy M51 has a way bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Reno5 Pro, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also has an external SD slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy M51 has a way better battery performance than OPPO Reno5 Pro, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity instead of 4350mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.