Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.29 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Astral Blue and Starry Black | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A77 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4350mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is much better than the OPPO Reno5 Pro, with a 90.8 score against 71.9. Although it's the best in this review, it must be noted that it's also heavier and a little thicker. The Galaxy Note 20 counts with a bit superior processor than OPPO Reno5 Pro. Both of them have a Octa-Core processor and a 8 GB RAM.
The OPPO Reno5 Pro has a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the OPPO Reno5 Pro also counts with a little bit higher pixels density. The Galaxy Note 20 and OPPO Reno5 Pro both count with extremely similar storage capacity for games and applications, both of them have the same internal storage.
The OPPO Reno5 Pro features a bit superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 1 percent bigger battery size. OPPO Reno5 Pro shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the OPPO Reno5 Pro also has faster 30 fps video frame rate, a larger aperture for better photos and videos in low-light environments and a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.