Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.29 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Astral Blue and Starry Black | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A77 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4350mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than OPPO Reno5 Pro, having a 98.9 score against 71.9. These devices include Android operating system, but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has newer 13 version while OPPO Reno5 Pro has Android 11. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a somewhat heavier and just a bit thicker phone than the OPPO Reno5 Pro.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with just a bit better hardware performance than OPPO Reno5 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM. The OPPO Reno5 Pro has just a bit better display than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has a just a little less pixels per inch in the screen, a much lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little bit smaller screen.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with much more storage for games and applications than OPPO Reno5 Pro, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features just a little better battery performance than OPPO Reno5 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4350mAh.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a superior camera than OPPO Reno5 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a back camera with lot more megapixels and a much higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.