Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.29 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Astral Blue and Starry Black | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A77 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4350mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a global score of 80.4, which is much better than the OPPO Reno5 Pro's global score of 71.9. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition design is just a little lighter than the OPPO Reno5 Pro, although it is a little thicker and was released many years before. OPPO Reno5 Pro features a little better performance than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Reno5 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The OPPO Reno5 Pro counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a bit lower pixel density and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a little larger screen. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a bit more storage capacity to install games and applications than OPPO Reno5 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB.
OPPO Reno5 Pro captures better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, a same size camera aperture and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the OPPO Reno5 Pro also has a way higher resolution back facing camera.
The OPPO Reno5 Pro has a way better battery life than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 4350mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.