Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.29 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Astral Blue and Starry Black | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A77 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4350mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 has a global score of 89, which is a lot better than the OPPO Reno5 Pro's 71.9 score. Galaxy Note10 is an older and a little thicker device than the OPPO Reno5 Pro, but Samsung managed to make it a little bit lighter anyway. OPPO Reno5 Pro has a sharper display than Galaxy Note10, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a just a little more pixels per inch in the display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400px resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a bit more powerful processing unit than OPPO Reno5 Pro. Both have the same number of cores and 8 GB of RAM memory. The OPPO Reno5 Pro has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures and videos and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Reno5 Pro also counts with a back facing camera with lot more megapixels.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has much more storage to store more apps and games than OPPO Reno5 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. The OPPO Reno5 Pro counts with greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has 4350mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.