Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.29 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Astral Blue and Starry Black | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A77 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4350mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e is way better than OPPO Reno5 Pro, having a score of 86.3 against 71.9. Galaxy S10e is an older and just a bit thicker phone than OPPO Reno5 Pro, but Samsung managed to make it somewhat lighter anyway. The OPPO Reno5 Pro counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a little bit worse screen density, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite bigger screen.
Galaxy S10e features a bit faster CPU than OPPO Reno5 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The OPPO Reno5 Pro shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for capturing pictures and video in low-light environments and slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the OPPO Reno5 Pro also counts with a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e features a lot bigger storage for applications and games than OPPO Reno5 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has an external memory card slot that holds up to 512 GB. The OPPO Reno5 Pro has a really longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has 4350mAh of battery capacity against 3100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.