Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.29 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Astral Blue and Starry Black | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A77 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4350mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 is a lot better than OPPO Reno5 Pro, getting a overall score of 94.8 against 71.9. The Samsung Galaxy S20 design is a little bit lighter than the OPPO Reno5 Pro, although it is a little bit thicker and was released around 11 months before. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S20 has 13 version and OPPO Reno5 Pro has Android 11.
Galaxy S20 has just a bit better processing power than OPPO Reno5 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S20 also has a higher amount of RAM. OPPO Reno5 Pro has a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy S20, because although it has a way worse pixels count per inch of display and a way lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a little larger display.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 features a very superior storage to install applications and games than OPPO Reno5 Pro, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. OPPO Reno5 Pro takes slightly better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S20, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the OPPO Reno5 Pro also has better 30 fps video frame rate, a much more MP camera in the back and a bigger camera aperture to capture better photos and videos in poorly lited situations.
OPPO Reno5 Pro features just a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S20, because it has a 4350mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.