Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.29 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Astral Blue and Starry Black | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A77 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4350mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 FE is way better than the OPPO Reno5 Pro, getting a score of 90.8 against 71.9. Even though the Galaxy S20 FE is a better phone than the OPPO Reno5 Pro, we must note that it is also a just a bit thicker and a little bit heavier phone. Both phones in this review come with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so they should offer the same OS features.
OPPO Reno5 Pro has a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE. Both have a display of the same size, the same 1080 x 2400 resolution and the same number of pixels per inch of screen. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features a little bit better hardware performance than OPPO Reno5 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a much better storage to store more games and applications than OPPO Reno5 Pro, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The OPPO Reno5 Pro has a little bit better camera than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality, the OPPO Reno5 Pro also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better low-light photography and videos and a camera with a way higher resolution.
Galaxy S20 FE has just a little better battery duration than OPPO Reno5 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.