Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.29 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Astral Blue and Starry Black | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A77 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4350mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than OPPO Reno5 Pro, with a 98 score against 71.9. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a newer 13 version while OPPO Reno5 Pro has Android 11 version. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's construction is older, thicker and much heavier than OPPO Reno5 Pro.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit better hardware performance than OPPO Reno5 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The OPPO Reno5 Pro counts with a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has a quite smaller display, a just a bit lower pixel density and a lot lower 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than OPPO Reno5 Pro, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has an external SD slot that holds up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit superior battery duration than OPPO Reno5 Pro, because it has a 15% greater battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots much better photos and videos than OPPO Reno5 Pro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low light photography and video, it also counts with a back camera with a much better 108 mega pixels resolution and a way higher video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.