Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.29 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Astral Blue and Starry Black | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A77 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4350mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is a lot better than the OPPO Reno5 Pro, with a 95.4 score against 71.9. The Galaxy S22 Ultra is a newer phone than the OPPO Reno5 Pro, although it is thicker and way heavier. Both devices we are comparing here have Android OS, but Galaxy S22 Ultra has the newer 13 version and OPPO Reno5 Pro has Android 11, so it gives a couple nice extra features and enhanced performance.
The OPPO Reno5 Pro counts with a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy S22 Ultra. Both have a Octa-Core CPU and 8 GB of RAM. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a little sharper display than OPPO Reno5 Pro, because it has a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution, a quite bigger display, a bit better number of pixels per inch of display and a really brighter display.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra features as much storage to store more games and applications as the OPPO Reno5 Pro one, they have equal internal memory capacity. The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a bit longer battery duration than OPPO Reno5 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4350mAh. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a very superior camera than OPPO Reno5 Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs and/or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a back facing camera with way more MP and a much higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.