Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2017-04-21 |
| 6.29 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Astral Blue and Starry Black | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A77 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4350mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S8 is much better than OPPO Reno5 Pro, having a overall score of 81.7 against 71.9. Although the Galaxy S8 is noticeably older and a little bit thicker than OPPO Reno5 Pro, it's construction is still somewhat lighter. The OPPO Reno5 Pro has a bit sharper display than Galaxy S8, because although it has a much lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a way worse display density, it also counts with a quite larger screen.
The Galaxy S8 features slightly more storage for applications and games than OPPO Reno5 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows up to 256 GB. OPPO Reno5 Pro counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy S8, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Reno5 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
The OPPO Reno5 Pro counts with a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S8, because it has 4350mAh of battery capacity. The OPPO Reno5 Pro shoots much better pictures and videos than Galaxy S8, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, a same size camera aperture and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the OPPO Reno5 Pro also has a camera with a way better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.