Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.29 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Astral Blue and Starry Black | Gold and Gray |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A77 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4350mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S8 Active has a general score of 81.9, which is much better than OPPO Reno5 Pro's 71.9 global score. The Galaxy S8 Active body is much older, much thicker and somewhat heavier than OPPO Reno5 Pro. The OPPO Reno5 Pro features a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno5 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM.
The OPPO Reno5 Pro features a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a lot lower number of pixels per screen inch and a much lower resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a little bit bigger display. The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active counts with a little bit better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Reno5 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 256 GB.
OPPO Reno5 Pro counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S8 Active, because it has 4350mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. OPPO Reno5 Pro captures better photos and videos than Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same (4K) video quality and the same camera aperture, the OPPO Reno5 Pro also has a much better resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.