Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.29 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Astral Blue and Starry Black | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A77 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4350mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S9 is better than OPPO Reno5 Pro, with an 83.3 score against 71.9. Despite of the fact the Samsung Galaxy S9 is way older and a little thicker than OPPO Reno5 Pro, it's design is still just a little lighter. The Galaxy S9 and OPPO Reno5 Pro count with really similar processors, and although the Galaxy S9 has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
OPPO Reno5 Pro has a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has a lot lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a way lower screen density, it also counts with a bit larger display. The Galaxy S9 counts with a greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Reno5 Pro, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 400 GB.
The OPPO Reno5 Pro counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and video and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the OPPO Reno5 Pro also counts with a way more mega pixels back-facing camera.
The OPPO Reno5 Pro features a really longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has a 4350mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.