Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.29 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Astral Blue and Starry Black | Black |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A77 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4350mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has an overall score of 81, which is better than OPPO Reno5 Pro's 71.9 score. Although Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a better phone than OPPO Reno5 Pro, it must be noted that it is also an older, noticeably thicker and noticeably heavier phone. Both of these devices have the same Android 11 OS (operating system).
The OPPO Reno5 Pro has a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Reno5 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM. OPPO Reno5 Pro counts with a better display than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a bit worse display density, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a quite bigger screen.
Galaxy XCover Pro has more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Reno5 Pro, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB. OPPO Reno5 Pro has a superior camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the OPPO Reno5 Pro also has a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
OPPO Reno5 Pro has a little better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 7 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.