Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.29 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Astral Blue and Starry Black | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A77 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4350mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a score of 88.5, which is a lot better than OPPO Reno5 Pro's 71.9 score. Both devices we compare here use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has 12 version while OPPO Reno5 Pro has Android 11 version. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's construction is just a little bit thinner than OPPO Reno5 Pro, but it is a little heavier and was released around 11 months before.
OPPO Reno5 Pro counts with a little bit better screen than Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a little bit worse amount of pixels per display inch, a little smaller screen and a little bit lower 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than OPPO Reno5 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit better hardware performance than OPPO Reno5 Pro. They have a 8 GB RAM and 8 CPU cores. OPPO Reno5 Pro captures better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution, the OPPO Reno5 Pro also counts with a back camera with lot more mega-pixels and a bigger aperture to take better low light photos and video.
OPPO Reno5 Pro features improved battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 32% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.