Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.29 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Astral Blue and Starry Black | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A77 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4350mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is way better than OPPO Reno5 Pro, having a global score of 92.3 against 71.9. Even though Galaxy Z Flip 5G and the OPPO Reno5 Pro were released only 6 months apart, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G body is a little thinner but also just a little bit heavier than the OPPO Reno5 Pro. Both of these phones use the same Android 11 OS (operating system).
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit more powerful CPU than OPPO Reno5 Pro. Both have a 8 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores. The OPPO Reno5 Pro has a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a little smaller screen, a just a bit less pixels per inch in the display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
OPPO Reno5 Pro has a superior camera than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Reno5 Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot higher 64 mega pixels resolution and a bigger aperture to capture better captures in low light environments.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a very superior memory to store more games and applications than OPPO Reno5 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The OPPO Reno5 Pro features superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 4350mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.