Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.29 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Astral Blue and Starry Black | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A77 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4350mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a general score of 94.6, which is much better than OPPO Reno5 Pro's global score of 71.9. These phones have the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't perceive any difference in that aspect. Galaxy Z Fold 2's construction is a bit thinner but noticeably heavier than the OPPO Reno5 Pro, and both of them were released only 4 months apart.
OPPO Reno5 Pro counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit better pixel number per screen inch. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit faster processing unit than OPPO Reno5 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than OPPO Reno5 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. The OPPO Reno5 Pro captures slightly better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Reno5 Pro also counts with a much more mega pixels back camera and a bigger aperture to take better low-light images and video.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a little longer battery lifetime than OPPO Reno5 Pro, because it has a 3 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.