Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-09-09 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.17 x 2.84 x 0.30 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Aurora and Stellar Black | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimesnity 900 MT6877 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a is a little bit better than the OPPO Reno6 5G, having a global score of 78.8 against 73.9. The Google Pixel 3a is a notably older and just a little thicker phone than OPPO Reno6 5G, but Google could make it lighter anyway. Both phones in this review work with the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't see any differences in that aspect.
The OPPO Reno6 5G counts with a little bit better performance than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Reno6 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The OPPO Reno6 5G has a little sharper screen than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a bit lower display density, it also counts with a quite larger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
The OPPO Reno6 5G takes much better videos and photos than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the OPPO Reno6 5G also has a larger aperture to take better low light captures and a camera with lot more megapixels. OPPO Reno6 5G has a much better storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The OPPO Reno6 5G has a way better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.