Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | HTC |
| Android 11 | Android 5.0 |
| 2021-09-09 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.17 x 2.84 x 0.30 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Aurora and Stellar Black | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 411 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimesnity 900 MT6877 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.16 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The HTC One M9 has a score of 77.7, which is a little bit better than the OPPO Reno6 5G's general score of 73.9. Both phones in our current comparison use Android operating system, but the HTC One M9 has the previous 5.0 version while OPPO Reno6 5G has Android 11. The HTC One M9 design is somewhat lighter than the OPPO Reno6 5G, but it is noticeably thicker and was released many years before.
HTC One M9 has a bit superior CPU than OPPO Reno6 5G, because although it has less RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with an extra graphics co-processor and a 64 bits processing unit. HTC One M9 has just a bit better looking display than OPPO Reno6 5G, because although it has a much smaller display and a bit worse 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution, it also counts with a quite better screen density.
OPPO Reno6 5G has a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games than HTC One M9, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The OPPO Reno6 5G shoots better photographs and videos than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Reno6 5G also has a much bigger camera aperture to take better low light images and videos and a camera with lot more mega-pixels.
OPPO Reno6 5G counts with a much longer battery lifetime than HTC One M9, because it has a 4300mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.