Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | HTC |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-09 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.17 x 2.84 x 0.30 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Aurora and Stellar Black | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 411 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimesnity 900 MT6877 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
HTC U11 is a bit better than the OPPO Reno6 5G, having a score of 77.6 against 73.9. The HTC U11 is a incredibly older and just a bit thicker phone than OPPO Reno6 5G, but HTC could make it a little bit lighter anyway. The OPPO Reno6 5G features a little bit better hardware performance than HTC U11, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno6 5G also has 4 GB more RAM.
The OPPO Reno6 5G features a bit more vivid screen than HTC U11, because although it has a just a little worse pixel density and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a larger screen. OPPO Reno6 5G captures better photographs and videos than HTC U11, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the OPPO Reno6 5G also has a way more megapixels camera.
The OPPO Reno6 5G features a little bit better storage capacity to store more games and applications than HTC U11, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The OPPO Reno6 5G features a very superior battery life than HTC U11, because it has a 4300mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.