Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-09 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.17 x 2.84 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Aurora and Stellar Black | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimesnity 900 MT6877 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is much better than the OPPO Reno6 5G's score of 73.9. LG V35 ThinQ is an extremely older device than OPPO Reno6 5G, but it's lighter and a bit thinner anyway. The OPPO Reno6 5G and the LG V35 ThinQ feature extremely similar displays, because although the LG V35 ThinQ has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than OPPO Reno6 5G, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ features a bit superior processor than OPPO Reno6 5G, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
OPPO Reno6 5G has longer battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh. OPPO Reno6 5G captures better pictures and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for shooting images and video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the OPPO Reno6 5G also counts with a camera in the back with lot more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.