Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-09 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.17 x 2.84 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Aurora and Stellar Black | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimesnity 900 MT6877 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is much better than OPPO Reno6 5G, with a general score of 83.8 against 73.9. The Galaxy A50 is a just a bit lighter cellphone than the OPPO Reno6 5G, but they are equally thin. The OPPO Reno6 5G counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy A50, and although they both have a same size screen, the OPPO Reno6 5G also has a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit more pixels per display inch.
Galaxy A50 features a very superior storage capacity for apps and games than OPPO Reno6 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A50 also has an external memory slot that supports up to 512 GB. The OPPO Reno6 5G counts with a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Reno6 5G also has more RAM.
The OPPO Reno6 5G captures much better videos and photos than Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the OPPO Reno6 5G also has a back facing camera with much more megapixels and a way higher video resolution. The OPPO Reno6 5G has a bit superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has an 8% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.